Large clinical trial by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, HCA Healthcare and UCI Health identifies best strategy to prevent life-threatening healthcare-associated ICU infections

Today, we are proud to announce a large multi-state study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, HCA Healthcare and the University of California, Irvine has found that a nasal antibiotic ointment, mupirocin, which is currently used daily for intensive care unit (ICU) patients in only one-third of U.S. hospitals, is highly effective at preventing Staphylococcus aureus infections in critically ill patients, outperforming an antiseptic solution.

This study involved more than 800,000 ICU patients in 137 HCA Healthcare hospitals, and built upon an earlier study among these research partners demonstrating that daily bathing with antiseptic chlorhexidine soap plus nasal mupirocin for all ICU patients prevented many bloodstream and other serious infections. This strategy is called “decolonization” because it reduces the amount of bacteria on the body in order to reduce infection risk. Today, as a result of the previous study, the majority of ICUs bathe patients with chlorhexidine; however, only one-third of hospital ICUs provide nasal mupirocin to all patients, largely due to fears of fueling antibiotic resistance.

Because of a concern that disease-causing bacteria might become resistant to mupirocin, the investigators compared mupirocin to an alternative nasal antiseptic product, known as povidone-iodine or iodophor.

The Mupirocin-Iodophor Swap Out Trial directly compared nasal mupirocin to nasal iodophor in the context of chlorhexidine bathing. The trial found that mupirocin worked significantly better than the antiseptic in preventing Staphylococcus aureus infection, including those due to methicillin-resistant S aureus, or MRSA. The CDC-funded study was published today in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).

The results resolved the question about whether nasal treatment is necessary in addition to chlorhexidine bathing to prevent these ICU infections. “This large study confirms that clearing the nose of bacteria prevents infection, and that the choice of product matters. Mupirocin antibiotic ointment remains the best treatment, and serious ICU infections can be avoided by simply giving patients mupirocin for the first five days of an ICU stay along with daily chlorhexidine bathing. Povidone-iodine does not work as well,” remarked lead investigator, Susan S. Huang, M.D., M.P.H., professor in the Division of Infectious Diseases at the University of California, Irvine School of Medicine.

The 137 participating community hospitals spanned 18 states and are part of HCA Healthcare, a leader in pragmatic research in real-life settings. Half of the hospitals continued their standard practice of treating ICU patients with mupirocin nasal ointment, and the other half switched to nasal povidone-iodine. All hospitals used the nasal product for five days plus chlorhexidine for daily bathing.

Importantly, this trial showed a durable benefit from mupirocin. The use of an antibiotic ointment for the past 10 years at HCA Healthcare did not diminish its impact. There was similar persistent clinical benefit even after nearly a decade of continuous ICU use, suggesting that use of chlorhexidine soap and mupirocin had not lost their effect. This is important because widespread antibiotic use can lead to antibiotic resistance in some instances.

Because of the size of the study and the fact that it was conducted at such a wide range of community hospitals, the results are generally believed to be applicable to hospitals across the country.

The study was conducted through a longstanding scientific consortium, including HCA Healthcare, Harvard Medical School’s Department of Population Medicine at the Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, the University of California, Irvine and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. This same scientific group conducted the REDUCE MRSA Trial over 10 years ago, which first showed that this decolonization regimen could reduce MRSA by 37% and bloodstream infections by 44%. Now, the Mupirocin-Iodophor Swap Out Trial showed that switching from mupirocin to iodophor produced 18% less protection from S. aureus infections.

“A unique opportunity presented itself to compare our REDUCE MRSA trial from 10 years ago to the Mupirocin-Iodophor Swap Out Trial. Although mupirocin was clearly better than povidone-iodine, there was also a strong suggestion that povidone-iodine was also preventative when compared to ICUs in the prior trial that received no nasal anti-infective. This provides even more evidence for the important role of the nose as a source of infection,” adds senior author Richard Platt, MD, MSc, professor and chair of the Department of Population Medicine at the Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute and Harvard Medical School.

The Mupirocin-Iodophor Swap Out Trial adds to a growing set of evidence that reducing the amount of bacteria on the skin and in the nose through decolonization can protect patients from infection during high-risk moments. This same scientific group not only conducted the REDUCE MRSA Trial, but also the ABATE Infection Trial which showed that decolonization of hospitalized patients with medical devices outside of the ICU reduces both bloodstream infections and antibiotic-resistant pathogens.

Additional information about the Mupirocin-Iodophor Swap Out Trial can be found in the JAMA author interview podcast.